Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2010-01-25 18:10:38
Message-ID: 4B5D8A3E020000250002EB9C@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: 
 
> It might be better to try a test case with lighter-weight objects,
> say 5 million simple functions.
 
Said dump ran in about 45 minutes with no obvious stalls or
problems.  The 2.2 GB database dumped to a 1.1 GB text file, which
was a little bit of a surprise.
 
-Kevin

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2010-01-25 18:19:24
Subject: Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-25 18:08:40
Subject: Re: commit fests

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group