| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 20:26:07 |
| Message-ID: | 4B58B85F.1090500@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
> On 21 Jan 2010, at 09:37, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
>> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
>> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
>> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>>
>> Wait for it....
>>
>> 9.0.
>
> darn, looks like PostgreSQL developers can only count to 4 :)
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-6-5.html
:)
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-01-21 20:34:28 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | svn | 2010-01-21 20:20:13 | SVN Commit by guillaume: r8164 - in branches/REL-1_10_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3/pgadmin: dlg schema |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-21 20:30:14 | primary key error message |
| Previous Message | Rafael Martinez | 2010-01-21 20:10:36 | PITR backup history files with identical 2nd part file names |