Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 19:38:56
Message-ID: 4B58AD50.9020807@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

Le 21/01/2010 20:31, Dave Page a écrit :
> On 1/21/10, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Le 21/01/2010 11:57, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I feel sorry for 8.5 now. It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
>>>> version.
>>>
>>> Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
>>> to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.
>>>
>>
>> Just saw this. Should we change every 8.5 with 9.0 in pgAdmin's code?
>> That's not a hard work, but it would probably be better to do that right
>> now.
>>
>
> I quite enjoy finding those old references - it's a weird reminder of
> history (and of course, it makes no difference to the operation of the
> code) :-)
>

Sure.

--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2010-01-21 19:54:58 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-01-21 19:31:03 Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-01-21 19:52:08 Re: Application name patch - v3
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-01-21 19:31:03 Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0