Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 19:00:12
Message-ID: 4B58A43C.2020902@lelarge.info (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
Le 21/01/2010 11:57, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 
>> I feel sorry for 8.5 now.  It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
>> version.
> 
> Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
> to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.
> 

Just saw this. Should we change every 8.5 with 9.0 in pgAdmin's code?
That's not a hard work, but it would probably be better to do that right
now.


-- 
Guillaume.
 http://www.postgresqlfr.org
 http://dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-21 19:08:04
Subject: Re: Partitioning syntax
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-21 18:50:25
Subject: Re: quoting psql varible as identifier

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-01-21 19:31:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-01-21 17:35:41
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group