Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Date: 2010-01-21 23:33:27
Message-ID: 4B588FE7020000250002E9B9@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
 
> If you want an example of something I *do* have a process problem
> with, it's Kevin Grittner's attempts to get people to put a
> significant number of cycles into thinking about true
> serializability.
> Right now is not the time for that to be happening.  I've been
> politely ignoring that thread, but ...
 
Not my motive, but if you think that'll be the effect of posting
milestone patches, I'll hold 'em back.  Apologies if I caused a
disruption.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-21 23:36:31
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-21 23:26:46
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group