Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Well, as long as streaming rep is running, you can't do a smart shutdown
>>> ... smart shutdown seems to treat the walreciever as a client
>>> connection. At the very least, this should be in the documentation.
>> How hard is it to fix?
> I think the first question is do we *want* to fix it, or is it
> appropriate behavior?
> If the master shuts down, will the slaves try to fail over to become
> masters? When the master restarts, will the slaves automatically
> reconnect? If these questions have the wrong answers, shutting down the
> master isn't something to be done lightly, and automatically
> disconnecting slaves would be a real bad idea.
Right - surely people who have been using pg_standby etc have discovered
this behaviour, so documenting it is fine I would think.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Takahiro Itagaki||Date: 2010-01-21 02:02:16|
|Subject: Re: Fix auto-prepare #2|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-21 01:58:19|
|Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown|