Greg Stark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Barring any objections shall I commit it like this?
> Actually before we get there could someone who demonstrated the
> speedup verify that this patch still gets that same speedup?
I think the final version of this patch could use at least one more
performance checking report that it does something useful. We got a lot
of data from Andres, but do we know that the improvements here hold for
others too? I can take a look at it later this week, I have some
interest in this area.
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Matthew Wakeling||Date: 2010-01-20 13:38:50|
|Subject: Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-01-20 04:13:03|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-01-20 05:26:26|
|Subject: Re: GUC failure on exception|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-01-20 05:14:59|
|Subject: Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby|