Kevin Grittner wrote:
> C'mon, you could have tried to inspire a *bit* more confidence by
> calling it version 0.1 or something! ;-)
As David used to say: JFDI
> I found that I just needed to ask for python-twisted.
Oh, sorry, yes, requirements: python, twisted.
I must admit that I haven't ever tested on python 2.6 before. I'll try
that (especially as it's the staircase to 3.0, IIUC).
Two more things: the concurrent update test (in the patch part) is
complete, while the second one is just a skeleton, ATM. (Just does a
concurrent COMMIT without actually doing anything).
Second: at the very end of pg_dtester.py, you find the line:
reporter = StreamReporter()
Try a CursesReporter() instead, it gives much nicer output!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-01-15 05:57:45|
|Subject: Re: per-user pg_service.conf|
|Previous:||From: Alex Hunsaker||Date: 2010-01-15 05:52:11|
|Subject: Re: attoptions|