Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Testing with concurrent sessions

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Michael Tan <mtanhl(at)gmail(dot)com>, david(at)kineticode(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Date: 2010-01-15 05:53:05
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> C'mon, you could have tried to inspire a *bit* more confidence by
> calling it version 0.1 or something!  ;-)


As David used to say: JFDI

 > I found that I just needed to ask for python-twisted.

Oh, sorry, yes, requirements: python, twisted.

I must admit that I haven't ever tested on python 2.6 before. I'll try 
that (especially as it's the staircase to 3.0, IIUC).

Two more things: the concurrent update test (in the patch part) is 
complete, while the second one is just a skeleton, ATM. (Just does a 
concurrent COMMIT without actually doing anything).

Second: at the very end of, you find the line:
  reporter = StreamReporter()

Try a CursesReporter() instead, it gives much nicer output!


Markus Wanner

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-01-15 05:57:45
Subject: Re: per-user pg_service.conf
Previous:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2010-01-15 05:52:11
Subject: Re: attoptions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group