| From: | Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Massive table (500M rows) update nightmare |
| Date: | 2010-01-14 21:19:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4B4F8A49.7010906@emolecules.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> Guys, I want to thank you for all of the advice - my client has just
> made a surprise announcement that he would like to set start from
> scratch with a new server, so I am afraid that all of this great advice
> has to be seen in the context of whatever decision is made on that. I am
> out there, hat-in-hand, looking for advice under the PERFORM post: "New
> server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?"
You might start this as a new topic with a relevant title, and reiterate your database requirements. Otherwise it will get submerged as just a footnote to your original question. It's really nice to be able to quickly find the new-equipment discussions.
Craig
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-01-14 21:22:09 | Re: new server I/O setup |
| Previous Message | Eduardo Piombino | 2010-01-14 21:01:33 | Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server |