| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpython3 |
| Date: | 2010-01-13 18:16:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4B4E0DF5.90904@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version
> over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be
> supporting a new version?
>
> If there is, I am still all for it, but I am a python bigot.
Yeah, it's just my viewpoint that we don't want 2 python procedural
languages in core. One should be in core, and one should go on
pgFoundry/PGAN. Which ever one is "better" by some clear definition
should go in core.
As I said, I have no opinion about whether Pye's PLpython should replace
the existing because I'm in no position to judge.
--Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-13 18:21:21 | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-13 18:15:28 | Re: [PATCH] remove redundant ownership checks |