> So it seems to me that the threshold question for this patch is - do
> we think it's a good idea to maintain two implementations of PL/python
> in core?

Not really, no.  This is why we need PGAN ;-)

If the new implementation is *better* that the existing PL/python, I
could see eventually replacing it.  It wouldn't be the first time that a
rewrite exceeded the original tool.

However, I'm not in a position to judge quality.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

• Re: plpython3 at 2010-01-13 03:05:27 from Robert Haas

Responses

• Re: plpython3 at 2010-01-13 17:47:18 from Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jaime Casanova	Date: 2010-01-13 04:11:48
	Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2010-01-13 03:55:24
	Subject: Re: Streaming replication status