> So it seems to me that the threshold question for this patch is - do
> we think it's a good idea to maintain two implementations of PL/python
> in core?
Not really, no. This is why we need PGAN ;-)
If the new implementation is *better* that the existing PL/python, I
could see eventually replacing it. It wouldn't be the first time that a
rewrite exceeded the original tool.
However, I'm not in a position to judge quality.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2010-01-13 04:11:48|
|Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-01-13 03:55:24|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication status|