Re: Serializable implementation

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Serializable implementation
Date: 2010-01-08 21:59:16
Message-ID: 4B475654020000250002E0F3@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think anything you decide about how to invoke the different
> isolation levels will be easy to change later to meet whatever the
> consensus of the community is at that time. I wouldn't spend any
> time or energy on it now. For purposes of your prototype patch,
> using REPEATABLE READ for the current serializable and
> SERIALIZABLE for the new behavior will be plenty good enough.

I think the attached (so far noop) patch covers that. This is "for
the record" for those interested; I'm not looking for review per se,
or commit.

-Kevin

P.S. The git hints worked like a charm, and saved much flailing.

Attachment Content-Type Size
serializable-001.patch text/plain 11.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2010-01-08 21:59:47 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Also update ChangerLog file.
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2010-01-08 21:57:36 Re: pgsql: Also update ChangerLog file.