Re: Serializable implementation

From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Serializable implementation
Date: 2009-12-28 23:20:33
Message-ID: 4B393D41.7060400@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.12.09 18:54 , Kevin Grittner wrote:
> To give some idea of the scope of development, Michael Cahill added
> SSI to InnoDB by modifying 250 lines of code and adding 450 lines of
> code; however, InnoDB already had the S2PL option and the prototype
> implementation isn't as sophisticated as I feel is necessary for
> real production use (particularly regarding the granularity of SIREAD
> locks). I'm assuming it would take more to reach real production
> quality in PostgreSQL. My SWAG would be to multiply by two or
> three.

I believe the hard part of implementing true serializability is not the
actual SSI or S2PL algorithm, but rather the necessary predicate locking
strategy.

So I think checking how InnoDB tackles that and how much of it's code is
invovled might give a more realistic estimate of the effort required.

best regards,
Florian Plug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2009-12-28 23:20:35 Re: [HACKERS] Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-12-28 23:15:38 Re: Serializable implementation