Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Serializable implementation

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>,"Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Serializable implementation
Date: 2009-12-29 00:42:50
Message-ID: 4B38FC2A020000250002D9F1@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
 
> Talking about the details of the conflict resolution algorithms
> and the benefits of serializable mode to your development
> methodology is all fantasy as long as you don't have any
> approaches to solve actually being able to detect the conflicts in
> the first place without rewriting many parts and large parts of
> the system.
 
Agreed.  I was hoping to keep the discussion on *this* thread
entirely off of technical issues like that.  I'll start specific
threads on specific technical issues as needed.  This will all turn
into a horribly opaque jumble if we mix it all up on one thread.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2009-12-29 00:43:15
Subject: Re: Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2009-12-29 00:39:33
Subject: Re: parse tree to XML format

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group