Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

(2009/12/18 15:48), Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> In both cases, I'm lost. Help?
>
> They might be contrasted with the comments for myLargeObjectExists.
> Since we use MVCC visibility in loread(), metadata for large object
> also should be visible in MVCC rule.
>
> If I understand them, they say:
> * pg_largeobject_aclmask_snapshot requires a snapshot which will be
> used in loread().
> * Don't use LargeObjectExists if you need MVCC visibility.

Yes, correct.

>> In acldefault(), there is this comment:
>> /* Grant SELECT,UPDATE by default, for now */
>> This doesn't seem to match what the code is doing, so I think we
>> should remove it.
>
> Ah, ACL_NO_RIGHTS is the default.

Oops, it reflects very early phase design, but fixed later.

>> I also notice that dumpBlobComments() is now misnamed, but it seems
>> we've chosen to add a comment mentioning that fact rather than fixing it.
>
> Hmmm, now it dumps not only comments but also ownership of large objects.
> Should we rename it dumpBlobMetadata() or so?

It seems to me quite natural.

The attached patch fixes them.

Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>