| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest status/management |
| Date: | 2009-12-01 13:27:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4B1519C5.6080902@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> It would also like to clarify the use case for this a little bit more.
>> Is this just to track patches which committers are in the process of
>> committing (or have committed)? Or would a committer potentially set
>> this on some patch that was still being reviewed, and if so would that
>> mean "don't review this any more because I'm taking over" or "I'm
>> planning to pick this up when the review process completes" or
>> something else?
>>
>
> I am thinking we can just add a new status, "claimed by committer" and
> not bother about adding a new column with the committer name.
>
>
I think it would be more flexible and useful to be able to "claim" it
before the review is finished. It would mean in effect "I am following
this and intend to commit it when it's ready".
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-12-01 13:30:23 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-01 13:08:18 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |