Tom Lane escreveu:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> So, if someone writes a patch, and it is reviewed, and the patch author
>> updates the patch and replies, it still should be reviewed again before
>> being committed?
> Well, that's for the reviewer to say --- if the update satisfies his
> concerns, he should sign off on it, if not not. I've tried to avoid
> pre-empting that process.
That's correct. I didn't have time to review the new patch yet. :( I'll do it
later today. IIRC Tom had some objections (during the last CF) the way the
patch was proposed and suggested changes. Let's see if the Takahiro-san did
everything that was suggested.
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Brar Piening||Date: 2009-12-01 11:54:03|
|Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-12-01 11:50:57|
|Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management|