Tom Lane escreveu:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> So, if someone writes a patch, and it is reviewed, and the patch author
>> updates the patch and replies, it still should be reviewed again before
>> being committed?
> 
> Well, that's for the reviewer to say --- if the update satisfies his
> concerns, he should sign off on it, if not not.  I've tried to avoid
> pre-empting that process.
> 
That's correct. I didn't have time to review the new patch yet. :( I'll do it
later today. IIRC Tom had some objections (during the last CF) the way the
patch was proposed and suggested changes. Let's see if the Takahiro-san did
everything that was suggested.


-- 
  Euler Taveira de Oliveira
  http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

• Re: ProcessUtility_hook at 2009-12-01 02:24:59 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Brar Piening	Date: 2009-12-01 11:54:03
	Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2009-12-01 11:50:57
	Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management