Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Writeable CTE patch

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Writeable CTE patch
Date: 2009-11-30 19:00:13
Message-ID: 4B14163D.7090104@cs.helsinki.fi (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> It would be
> altogether cleaner though if the CommandCounterIncrement responsibility
> were in the same place it is now, ie the caller of the executor.  Which
> could be possible if we restructure the rewriter/planner output as a
> list of Queries instead of just one.  I'm not currently sure how hard
> that would be, though; it might not be a practical answer.

I'm trying to avoid doing this, at least for now.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-11-30 19:27:37
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add solaris path for docbook COLLATEINDEX
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-30 18:56:40
Subject: Re: Writeable CTE patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group