| From: | Bosco Rama <postgres(at)boscorama(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |
| Date: | 2009-11-20 20:02:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4B06F5D8.5050204@boscorama.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Howdy folks,
I have an application that works just fine in PG 8.3.
We've installed 8.4 on another machine to perform pre-
migration testing. When we tried to compile our ecpg
stuff under 8.4 the first thing that caught us was an
error stating that the column name 'server' was causing
an error.
According to the PG docs 'server' is a *non-reserved*
keyword. Does ecpg treat it as a reserved word?
TIA
Bosco.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-20 20:38:12 | pgsql: Add a WHEN clause to CREATE TRIGGER, allowing a boolean |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-20 19:58:06 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-21 00:02:11 | Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |
| Previous Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-11-19 21:37:58 | Re: Encoding using the Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP |