Greg Smith wrote:
> Karl Denninger wrote:
>> With the write cache off on these disks they still are huge wins for
>> very-heavy-read applications, which many are.
> Very read-heavy applications would do better to buy a ton of RAM
> instead and just make sure they populate from permanent media (say by
> reading everything in early at sequential rates to prime the cache).
> There is an extremely narrow use-case where SSDs are the right
> technology, and it's only in a subset even of read-heavy apps where
> they make sense.
Out of curiosity, what are those narrow use cases where you think SSD's
are the correct technology?
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
In response to
Responses
pgsql-performance by date
| Next: | From: Dave Crooke | Date: 2009-11-13 20:22:22 |
| Subject: Re: SSD + RAID |
| Previous: | From: Merlin Moncure | Date: 2009-11-13 18:57:28 |
| Subject: Re: SSD + RAID |