Robert Haas wrote:
> 2009/10/27 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>> - no statement support to specify security context.
>> (It makes impossible to add support in pg_dump. Is it really OK?)
> I doubt that anything without pg_dump support would be even vaguely OK...
In my previous experience, it enabled to reduce 300-400 lines of the patch.
But here is no more sense than the 300-400 lines.
In my honest, I like to include a feature to specify an explicit security
context in the patch from the begining.
(It also allows to attach test cases with more variations.)
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2009-10-28 04:15:19|
|Subject: Re: Where's the docs?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-10-28 03:40:57|
|Subject: Re: Where's the docs? |