Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Date: 2009-10-01 18:24:27
Message-ID: 4AC4F3DB.2030705@pjmodos.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Erm, wait, we're going to drop the only piece of this that outside folks
>> have actually been asking for? Specifically, having per-schema default
>> ACLs?
>>
>
> They are per-schema for the objects belonging to the granting user.
> Otherwise you have a bunch of nasty issues, including the prospect
> of non-superusers being able to control the privileges granted on
> objects that don't belong to them.
>
Also it's not really a problem since superuser or role admin can set
these for other roles.

--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-10-01 18:36:34 Re: FSM search modes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-01 18:21:25 Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs