Re: pgAdmin and Slony

From: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dave(dot)page(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Sachin Srivastava <sachin(dot)srivastava(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgAdmin and Slony
Date: 2009-09-30 13:03:54
Message-ID: 4AC3573A.8060506@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Dave,

I really did not get a chance to test this one.
But, when I reviewed it at that time, I looked good to me.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi

EnterpriseDB INDIA - www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com>

Dave Page wrote:
> Ashesh - did you get a chance to test this?
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ashesh Vashi
> <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me..
>> Though not tested..
>> I will be able to test it tomorrow.
>>
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Sachin
>> Srivastava<sachin(dot)srivastava(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> - bool dlgRepCluster::SlonyMaximumVersion(wxString series, long minor)
>>
>> should be:
>>
>> bool dlgRepCluster::SlonyMaximumVersion(const wxString&series, long minor)
>>
>> Done.
>>
>> - Just reading the patch, it looks like we never try to load xxid*.sql
>> any more. That's surely wrong?
>>
>> Yes. Attached is an updated patch.
>>
>> Thanks. I've had a quick look, and it looks reasonable to me. Ashesh;
>> can you review it as well please?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-09-30 13:12:13 Re: pgAdmin and Slony
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-09-30 12:23:22 Re: pgAdmin and Slony