Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Upgrade db format without older version of PostgreSQL

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrade db format without older version of PostgreSQL
Date: 2009-09-29 18:07:57
Message-ID: 4AC24CFD.5000206@hogranch.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote
>>  but yeah, trying to build it on a modern Linux system looks
>> a bit shaky.  If you do go this route, I'd recommend making sure it
>> passes its regression tests before you risk letting it touch your real
>> data.
>>     
>
> geometry and horology tests are failing here. regression.diffs is
> attached for reference.
>   


same here on CentOS 5.x, except the geometry test had fewer failures 
logged, only the  "six | box" one, and the differences were 
.000000000000001 rounding kinda things, like -0.535533905932738 came out 
-0.535533905932737.

the horology tests seem to be all about PST vs PDT and may well be 
because Mar 15 is now PDT  when it didn't used to be?

I'm guessing this is good enough to dump his data from.





In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Amitabh KantDate: 2009-09-29 19:00:47
Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-09-29 17:59:36
Subject: Re: Upgrade db format without older version of PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group