Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large fixed-width text

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large fixed-width text
Date: 2009-09-28 05:33:42
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-www
Dave Page napsal(a):
> On 9/27/09, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net> wrote:
>> Dave Page napsal(a):
>>>> Anyway those #txtArchives pre and #txtArchives tt do not affect
>>>> documentation but they indeed seem to be plain wrong, they are actually
>>>> only
>>>> used by Opera (and maybe Chrome , I don't have that browser) and the text
>>>> looks huge there. In FF and Safari they are overwritten by
>>>> #pgContainer code, #pgContainer pre, #pgContainer tt {
>>>>   font-size: 1.2em;
>>>> }
>>>> in geckofixes.css (yes it loads for Safari too on my machine and it's a
>>>> good
>>>> thing) and in IE they're overwritten by
>>>> * html #txtArchives pre { font-size: 100%; }
>>>> in iefixes.css.
>>> txtArchives is used by, not the docs.
>> Cite from the first sentence: *Anyway those #txtArchives pre and
>> #txtArchives tt do not affect
>> documentation*
> Yes, i did read what you wrote. I was pointing out what they do affect.

Oh, ok, I know they affect mail body in archives and all I said is true 
- they are overwritten by other rules in most browsers and the text is 
huge in browsers where they're not overwritten. I think better default 
would be 120%, it may still look big somewhere but not as big as it does 
now and it compensates for that monospace vs normal font default size.

Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: std pikDate: 2009-09-28 06:13:40
Subject: Postgres performance
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-09-27 19:16:09
Subject: Re: Large fixed-width text

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group