| From: | Hans-Juergen Schoenig -- PostgreSQL <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sándor Miglécz <sandor(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5 |
| Date: | 2009-09-23 18:58:37 |
| Message-ID: | 4ABA6FDD.7030300@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Janes wrote:
> Will statement_timeout not suffice for that use case?
we tried to get around it without actually touching the core but we
really need this functionality.
patching the core here is not the primary desire we have. it is all
about modeling some functionality which was truly missing.
many thanks,
hans
--
Cybertec Schoenig & Schoenig GmbH
Reyergasse 9 / 2
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: www.postgresql-support.de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-09-23 19:03:27 | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |
| Previous Message | Hans-Juergen Schoenig -- PostgreSQL | 2009-09-23 18:53:54 | Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5 |