Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

From: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date: 2009-09-06 00:19:04
Message-ID: 4AA2FFF8.6070806@denninger.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have the other
one in my email system any more to follow up to it.

I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off.  Ciao.

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Karl Denninger escribió:
>   
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>>> You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
>>>       
>> Yes I did.  Go back and look at the archives.  I provided full EXPLAIN
>> and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original query.  Sheesh.
>>     
>
> You did?  Where?  This is your first message in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
> No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.
>
>   

Attachment: karl.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (124 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2009-09-06 05:36:24
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-09-06 00:15:00
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group