Re: Viable alternatives to SQL?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kelly Jones <kelly(dot)terry(dot)jones(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Viable alternatives to SQL?
Date: 2009-08-27 17:13:30
Message-ID: 4A96BEBA.2090201@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joshua Tolley wrote:
> I've never heard of the first two, as far as I can recall. T-SQL is quite
> common, however (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transact-SQL), but although I've
> never used it, I seriously doubt it will make things any more user friendly.
>

TransactSQL, sometimes called TSQL, is MS SQL Server's equivalent of
PL/PGSQL. I doubt this is what the OP was referring to.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-27 17:36:17 Re: Data audit trail techniques in postgresql
Previous Message Nathaniel Smith 2009-08-27 16:28:31 Data audit trail techniques in postgresql