Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Rebased to correct for pg_indent changes.
> Thanks for doing that.
No problem. I think I still owe you a few. :-)
> Attached is a further small improvement that gets rid of the
> find_ready_items() scans. After re-reading the patch I realized
> that it wasn't *really* avoiding O(N^2) behavior ... but this
> version does.
I'll run a fresh set of benchmarks.
By the way, I muffed the setup of last night's benchmarks, so no new
information there, except that in the process of reviewing the attempt
I discovered I was guilty of making a false assertion yesterday, based
on remembering incorrectly. The logs show that the six hour dump to
custom format was over the LAN. :-( I hope I didn't waste too much
of people's time by saying otherwise. I'll try to get some numbers on
the same-box dump soon. (Note to self: never, ever trust your memory;
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Field||Date: 2009-07-31 17:29:15|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 win32 shared memory patch|
|Previous:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2009-07-31 16:26:53|
|Subject: Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING|