Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Scott Carey" <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
Date: 2009-07-30 21:43:08
Message-ID: 4A71CD9C020000250002916D@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote:
 
> Gzip does have some quirky performance behavior depending on the
> chunk size of data you stream into it.
 
Yeah, I've run into that before.  If we're sending each individual
datum to a gzip function rather than waiting until we've got a
decent-size buffer, that could explain it.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-07-30 21:45:26
Subject: Re: autovacuum 'stuck' ?
Previous:From: Scott CareyDate: 2009-07-30 21:20:05
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group