Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
Date: 2009-07-30 17:35:13
Message-ID: 4A7193810200002500029104@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Hmmm ... AFAIR there isn't a good reason for dump to custom format
> to take longer than plain text dump, except for applying
> compression. Maybe -Z0 would be worth testing? Or is the problem
> that you have to write the data to a disk file rather than just
> piping it?

I'm not sure without benchmarking that. I was writing to the same
RAID as the database I was dumping, so contention was probably a
significant issue. But it would be interesting to compare different
permutations to see what impact each has alone and in combination.

I'm OK with setting up a benchmark run each night for a while, to
shake out what I can, on this and the artificial cases.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2009-07-30 18:14:19 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-30 17:28:15 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions