Re: psql - small fix in \du

From: Andreas Wenk <a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql - small fix in \du
Date: 2009-07-22 10:45:45
Message-ID: 4A66EDD9.5010608@netzmeister-st-pauli.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ANdreas Wenk schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> attached you can find a very small patch for the help in psql (\?). It's
> possible to use \du also as \du+ . The [+] was missing in help.
>
> I was asking about this at the general list and Peter E. was asking me
> to provide a patch. I sent the patch there but realized now, that this
> was the wrong place to do so. Sorry for the flood ...
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>

As written in another post \dg misses also the [+] so I changed that. Now I recognized
that I also have to change psql-ref.sgml (sorry did not see it in help.c). So I wanted to
update it and I am now wondering, what will be written in the description row when using
\du+ or \dg+. I am not sure when the function shobj_description(oid, name) is giving a
result.

Can anybody give me a hint or a scenario so that I can update the patch correctly?

Thanks a lot

Andy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2009-07-22 11:25:37 Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-07-22 09:03:04 Re: [PATCH] user mapping extension to pg_ident.conf