Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Calling conventions

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Calling conventions
Date: 2009-07-21 14:02:02
Message-ID: 4A65840A0200002500028A50@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> wrote: 
 
> I have implemented the very same algorithm as in Postgres, emulating
> index pages and all.
 
> The java program uses as near an on-disc format as Postgres does -
> just held in memory instead of in OS cache.
 
Interesting.  Hard to explain without a lot more detail.  Are they
close enough in code structure for a comparison of profiling output
for both to make any sense?  Have you tried switching the calling
convention yet; and if so, what impact did that have?
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2009-07-21 14:16:32
Subject: Re: hyperthreaded cpu still an issue in 8.4?
Previous:From: Matthew WakelingDate: 2009-07-21 14:01:43
Subject: Re: Full text search with ORDER BY performance issue

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group