Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
Date: 2009-07-20 23:41:32
Message-ID: 4A6500AC.1020307@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> How many people are you looking for? Is there a number or are you
> waiting for a good feeling?

The problem is not the number of people who like the patch, but the 
number of people who are willing to refactor and  maintain it.  Right 
now, if NEC decided to abandon Postgres, or if they decided that they 
don't like the changes we make in order to merge it, we'd have nobody to 
maintain it.

Given the amount of money which the security community represents, it 
seems like at least a few of these people could become, or sponsor, code 
maintainers.

I was hoping to support some of this effort through Sun when SEPostgres 
was introduced, but that didn't happen.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-07-20 23:42:23
Subject: Re: COPY WITH CSV FORCE QUOTE *
Previous:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-07-20 23:35:38
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group