Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO items

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO items
Date: 2009-07-02 21:43:43
Message-ID: 4A4D2A0F.3000607@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>   
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>>>       
>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>> those items to it?
>>     
>
> For historical record I could see benefit.
>
>   

Doesn't the wiki keep a page history? I don't see much point in keeping 
the old items in a current page.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-02 21:50:29
Subject: Re: TODO items
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-07-02 21:39:14
Subject: Re: bug in Google translate snippet

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group