Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 development schedule

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Date: 2009-07-01 21:42:03
Message-ID: 4A4BD82B.6070502@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>   
>> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 17:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>     
>>> It comes down to somebody having the willingness to say "no" and the
>>> authority to make it stick.  Robert mentioned upthread that the
>>> committers don't want to be seen as throwing their weight around,
>>>       
>
>   
>> Is that the purpose of core? To make exactly those decisions? 
>>     
>
> Core has never seen itself as intended to make feature-by-feature
> decisions.  People seem to be willing to defer to us on release
> schedule-setting, but it's not clear to me that the community has
> delegated us more authority than that.
>
> 			
>   


You have correctly identified the requirement in the sentence quoted 
above. I for one am quite prepared to support core or some person 
designated by core having such authority. I agree with you that without 
something like that not much will improve.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-07-01 21:46:41
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-07-01 21:38:41
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group