Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 development schedule

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Date: 2009-07-01 17:39:19
Message-ID: 4A4B58F702000025000281FA@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote: 
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> To what do you attribute the extended time needed to handle the
>> final CF? How can that be made better?
> 
> We had many patches that had been through previous commit-fests with
> minor adjustments and we had to finalize them before we could close
> the final commit-fest.  To be clear I am talking about patches that
> were eventually applied in 8.4, not patches that were rejected for
> 8.4.
 
Thanks.  That answers the first question.
 
I guess it suggests that the second question could be refined to:
 
What could have been done to finalize these patches in earlier
commit-fests or bump them to 8.5 before they dragged the process of
wrapping the release by half a year?
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-01 17:39:30
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2009-07-01 17:35:10
Subject: 8.3 PLpgSQL Can't Compare Records?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group