Re: 8.5 development schedule

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Date: 2009-07-01 17:39:19
Message-ID: 4A4B58F702000025000281FA@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> To what do you attribute the extended time needed to handle the
>> final CF? How can that be made better?
>
> We had many patches that had been through previous commit-fests with
> minor adjustments and we had to finalize them before we could close
> the final commit-fest. To be clear I am talking about patches that
> were eventually applied in 8.4, not patches that were rejected for
> 8.4.

Thanks. That answers the first question.

I guess it suggests that the second question could be refined to:

What could have been done to finalize these patches in earlier
commit-fests or bump them to 8.5 before they dragged the process of
wrapping the release by half a year?

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-01 17:39:30 Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-07-01 17:35:10 8.3 PLpgSQL Can't Compare Records?