Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What about "revert the patch"?
> That's probably just as dangerous.
I don't feel comfortable either reverting such a big patch at last
minute. Would need a fair amount of testing to make sure that the
revertion is correct and that no patches committed after the patch are
I'm testing the attached patch at the moment. It's the same as the
previous one, with the elog() in mdsync() issue fixed.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-06-25 17:25:22|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4879: bgwriter fails to fsync the file in recovery mode |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-06-25 17:00:55|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4879: bgwriter fails to fsync the file in recoverymode|