Andrew Chernow wrote:
>> The only issue now is a small leak of memory in a function that is only
>> called a fixed (and very small) number of times per process. Given this,
>> I'm inclined to say we should put it on hold for 8.5. Thoughts?
> Doesn't sound urgent to me. If it were my decision, I'd punt it to 8.5.
Ok. Agreed then - added to the commitfest page.
> Hard to keep that win32 acl stuff leak free. There is always a cleanup
> goto because you need 6 billion objects to answer any question :o
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2009-06-24 15:27:02|
|Subject: Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Chernow||Date: 2009-06-24 13:57:23|
|Subject: Re: GetTokenInformation() and FreeSid() at port/exec.c|