| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: building without perl |
| Date: | 2009-06-23 04:11:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4A4055E4.3010609@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, further investigation discloses that someone broke the no-Perl
>>> defense in psql's makefile back in 8.0, and we hadn't noticed till now.
>>>
>
>
>> Don't we ship sql_help.h in the tarball? I thought that's all the perl
>> was used for in psql.
>>
>
> Yeah, but the makefile protected that with "ifdef PERL", which stopped
> failing as intended when someone forced some quotes into the value of
> PERL. I'm about to commit something that hopefully will be a bit more
> robust.
>
>
>
Oh. Oops!
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-06-23 04:24:19 | Re: security checks for largeobjects? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-06-23 04:06:32 | Re: security checks for largeobjects? |