David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:31:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are
>>>> internal, no?
>>> It depends on your definition. The lo interface is pretty much to
>>> objects on the file system directly.
>> LO's are transaction-controlled, and they're not (readily)
>> accessible from outside the database. Seems rather completely
>> different from regular filesystem files.
> Not according to SQL/MED.
>> (In any case, there wasn't anything I liked about SQL/MED's ideas
>> about external files, so I'm not in favor of modeling LO management
>> after that.)
> Good point ;)
I would like to develop the feature independent from SQL/MED.
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-06-23 02:03:52|
|Subject: building without perl|
|Previous:||From: Alan Li||Date: 2009-06-23 00:29:44|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?|