Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot
Date: 2009-05-29 22:05:48
Message-ID: 4A205C3C.5010308@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> Here's a draft patch that does ordering using two lists, as I proposed.
> Please test to see if it's any faster or slower than the original logic.

Great.  I'll need to get permission from a client; I can't host large 
enough/complex enough databases on my own system.  :-(

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Konstantin IzmailovDate: 2009-05-29 22:14:20
Subject: Re: information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2009-05-29 22:03:30
Subject: Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group