| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: search_path vs extensions |
| Date: | 2009-05-29 21:58:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4A205A7A.3070007@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert,
> Of course we have no notion of exporting or importing names at all.
> Maybe we should. But I'm still of the opinion that this entire
> discussion is a tangent.
As far as Extensions are concerned? Yes, it is.
Dimitri: I vote for you to get on with assuming everything goes into
pg_extensions. We can always change that later if there's any kind of
consensus.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-05-29 22:00:14 | Re: search_path vs extensions |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-05-29 21:52:59 | Re: search_path improvements WAS: search_path vs extensions |