Simon Riggs wrote:
> Regrettably, the patch doesn't remove the problem it was supposed to
> remove and I'm highlighting there is still risk of data loss.
I feel that you're moving the goalposts. What exactly is the problem it
was supposed to remove in your opinion?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-05-29 18:54:02|
|Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-05-29 18:44:22|
|Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type |