Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
Date: 2009-05-29 18:46:25
Message-ID: 4A202D81.2070505@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Regrettably, the patch doesn't remove the problem it was supposed to
> remove and I'm highlighting there is still risk of data loss. 

I feel that you're moving the goalposts. What exactly is the problem it 
was supposed to remove in your opinion?

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-05-29 18:54:02
Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-05-29 18:44:22
Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group