| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python |
| Date: | 2009-05-29 14:41:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4A1FF431.2070606@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Blewett wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
> <mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> Does Python 3 have some sort of usable sandbox that would mean we
> could have a trusted plpython?
>
>
> I brought this up last August [1]. Zope has a working sandbox that
> they include in their distribution.
>
>
> 1.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/9d1f8d830808041008v50104fd8p6181d5ddce85a6a@mail.gmail.com
>
How many python installations have this gadget? If the answer is "not
many" then it's not much good to us, unless someone wants to create
PL/zope-sandbox. Really, something like this should be part of a
standard python installation.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-05-29 15:05:47 | Re: search_path vs extensions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-29 14:27:27 | Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type |