The attached addresses items#2 and 3 as listed by Bruce here:
I think it is consistent with the discussions we had a PGCon last week.
Any objections to me committing this for 8.4?
On a side note, should I try to address items #1 & #4 for 8.4 as well?
Perhaps #4 yes since it is arguably a bug fix, but no to #1?
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mark Wong||Date: 2009-05-27 01:56:47|
|Subject: effects of posix_fadvise on WAL logs|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-05-27 01:39:25|
|Subject: Re: commitfest management webapp |