Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date: 2009-04-22 18:58:53
Message-ID: 49EF68ED.6040204@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Does a prepared xact still block vacuum cleanup in HEAD, or has that
> been fixed since 8.2?

It still does. A prepared xact is just like a idle-in-transaction 
backend as far as vacuum is concerned.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2009-04-22 19:03:15
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2009-04-22 18:55:27
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group