Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date: 2009-04-22 18:37:16
Message-ID: 49EF63DC.6040108@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> I think we should change the way we test it. Could we simply make 
> max_prepared_transactions = 0 the default, but put 
> "max_prepared_transactions = 5" into the config file in "make check"? 
> That seems like the best alternative, it doesn't seem right to build 
> extra config options or other infrastructure into the server just so 
> that the regression tests can test a feature.
>
>

FWIW, modern versions of the buildfarm script have support for 
non-standard options in the install-check pieces.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-04-22 18:40:56
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-04-22 18:35:22
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group