Re: Replacing plpgsql's lexer

From: Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replacing plpgsql's lexer
Date: 2009-04-18 09:23:37
Message-ID: 49E99C19.5080302@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

++

David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:01:39PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> David Fetter wrote:
>>
>>> Speaking of standard_conforming_strings, I know it's late, but if
>>> we make it a requirement now, a lot of problems just go away.
>>> Yes, it's inconvenient, but we're making lots of big changes, so
>>> one more shouldn't halt adoption.
>> 16 days too late ...
>
> Depends. If we've found show-stopping bugs, as it appears we may have
> done, in not requiring standards_conforming_strings, we can't just
> pull a MySQL and ship anyhow.
>
> Cheers,
> David.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Golub 2009-04-18 09:31:54 [PATCH] Borland C Compiler compatibility issues
Previous Message Pavel Golub 2009-04-18 08:57:11 [PATCH] MinGW compatibility issues