| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | decibel(at)decibel(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 |
| Date: | 2009-03-29 21:33:30 |
| Message-ID: | 49CFE92A.8000101@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 3/15/09 1:40 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>
>
> decibel wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>>> Fair enough.. Well I am now appealing to all who has a fairly decent
>>> sized hardware want to try it out and see whether there are "gains",
>>> "no-changes" or "regressions" based on your workload. Also it will
>>> help if you report number of cpus when you respond back to help
>>> collect feedback.
EAStress (the J2EE benchmark from Spec) would be perfect for this, and
we (community) have a license for it.
However, EAstress really requires 2-3 J2EE servers to keep the DB server
busy.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2009-03-30 10:17:48 | Re: Very specialised query |
| Previous Message | Marc Mamin | 2009-03-27 22:53:22 | Re: Very specialised query |